In 1979, while in the Est training, I discovered I had a
point-of-view; not just A point-of-view, but THE true
point-of-view (POV). That second part was the most difficult to
get. I stood in there in an exchange with Randy, the leader, sorting out the
difference between my POV, other’s POVs, the truth, perceptions,
interpretations, and beliefs.
After ten minutes of back and forth with Randy, I got that I
(we all) have a POV. However, my POV wasn’t just any POV, it was closer to the
truth – that shared POV that I knew was out there, supported by a majority
number of facts (otherwise known as perceptions), so that my POV was the best,
most informed, and defendable POV. It was a justified POV; more like the truth;
clearly what I knew and my REALITY, my “what’s so”.
And if I could enroll a sufficient number of other people,
or find enough others who already agreed with me, then there was real agreement.
And when we had enough agreement, we had the ultimate truth, i.e.
“rocks-are-hard-and-water-is-wet”, sort of like they preach in church.
Believe me I wasn’t happy about discovering that what I
thought was “true”, or “real” was just my point-of-view. I argued that there
was “truth and reality”, there was cause and effect. So I challenged Randy with
a bunch “what-ifs and how-about’s”.
“What about rocks are hard?”, I asked. “Are you
saying they aren’t?”. “And isn’t water wet?” (The phrase, “Rocks-are-hard-and-water-is-wet”,
had been used earlier in the program). Randy just smiled. And stuck his tongue
out at me. I stood there flummoxed, thinking from somewhere I’d never thought
from before, while he just waited; waited for me to let go of my POV about my
POV and look from a new place.
I thought to myself, “Ok. Rocks are hard to me. Maybe
even to us. Then how about from a molecular perspective? Or the perspective of
the universe? Are rocks hard to the universe?
Maybe not. At least from that universe’s perspective. Does the universe even have a perspective? Maybe from that perspective rocks are just very slow-moving particles; and we call them hard, and agree that they are, in fact, hard. Is there any “hard” in the universe?”
Maybe not. At least from that universe’s perspective. Does the universe even have a perspective? Maybe from that perspective rocks are just very slow-moving particles; and we call them hard, and agree that they are, in fact, hard. Is there any “hard” in the universe?”
I was about to sit down when a new what-about popped into the that voice-in-my-head, which by this point in the weekend, had become very present for me.“Well what about GOD. We all know there’s a GOD, don’t we? If that’s a POV, it’s global!”, I said.
“Maybe”, Randy responded. He went on, “I could ask, which is really GOD? What about Buddha, Allah, Paramatta, The Great Spirit, or kami? Which is the true God, the right God?.
“I’m not arguing
that any particular one of these is the supreme one, or the right one, or the
true one. Maybe they are all just large-population-points-of-view, all
agreements among very large populations. And there are some people, even a lot
of people, who believe there is no GOD. That’s their point-of-view.”
he finished.
I sat down. I
realized there was no way out of this box. I have a point of view and I cannot
escape that I have a POV. And neither can anyone else. So, what’s the big deal?
There is no way to be free of our points-of-view. We can argue
that our POV is the “right” POV. We can argue that other’s POVs are not, or
that ours is supported by more facts, more scientific research, more
agreements, more laws, more research, more evidence, etc. Right? There’s that
word “right”.
Mostly though we just accept our POVs as what’s so. We don’t
inspect them. We don’t question them. Indeed, we seek evidence to support them.
And we certainly don’t give them up easily! They just are. Get enough in that
pile of evidence and we’re certain our POV is the right POV. There’s that
word “right” again.
And when anyone argues with our point-of-view we dig in our
heels. We dredge up our practiced justifications and launch into spirited
defenses of our POVs. Those defenses are
also part of our point-of-view. It’s ALL just our point-of-view.
It’s all we’ve got! We can’t escape it!
There’s no proof that one is better than another, arguments rarely
change it. We are doomed to be right about it! We will defend our POVs
to the death. We can’t give them up. We can’t let go of them. Our brains are hard-wired
to their truthfulness. They are our very reality!
It sucks to have a POV! Think about it. If all I think is
just my point-of-view, then who's responsible? Who do I blame? If my POV is
that GOD is ultimately the final responsible party, then I'm off the hook! After
all, “Its Gods will". Right?
I mean, who in their right mind wants to be responsible for
their POV? Their attitudes? Their perceptions? Their opinions? Their very
reality? Really? Come on dude! What about the “stupid” people who support
Trump?
I saw a collective-scientifically-supported-POV on the
National Geographic Channel a while back (Mass Extinction) that asserts there
is scientific proof that we (people) are currently engaged in
practices that are bringing about the sixth mass extinction of life on
the planet. Included in our practices is our denial that
we are engaged in, and responsible for, or have anything to do with that
ultimate planetary result, which the scientists predict will have concluded
within the next 200 years
Don’t worry though. It’s just their POV!
There is
a useful response to people's POV, however: "Thank you for sharing."